This is great stuff, especially the part about her challenging you and wanting to show her who is boss! Great insight man, you are the king of content today! Anyways, looking forward to reading the rest of your thoughts on this subject. Also, 3 Same Day Lays in the past few weeks, nice, I wanna start doing day game! Malls sound cool.
once I opened with a direct opener and then later used a statement of intent. later on the date the girl told me that she could not remember my direct opener but she remembers my statement of intent.
I would like to hear more of your thougts on this particular subject...
P.S.: I know you're probably not too keen on writing LR's anymore, but if they had valuable lessons like this I think a lot of people would really benefit from that as well. Just give it a thougt...
John said: "..verbal foreplay. When a woman verbally spars with you she's testing to see if you can handle her. The implications being if you can handle her in conversation you can handle her in the bedroom."
This is the key to the castle. I had a nice little lightbulb moment reading this portion. Living in a civilized modern societies, our brains have had to find modern ways to express their more raw, primitive instincts. So at work, for example, when your Boss is pissed off at you, instead ov tackling you to the ground, mounting your back, and choking you the fuck out, he calls you into his office and subtly, or not-so-subtly proceeds to rip you a new asshole VERBALLY. This is the identical process taking place with verbal foreplay. When we encounter women we want to fuck, convenient as it may be, it's poor form to also tackle and mount. Therefore, we verbally dominate her with sexual overtone to demonstrate what we are capable ov and willing to do. If you can't lead and dominate a woman conversationally in a safe, playful manner, why in the fuck would you ever be able to do so in her bedroom, naked and vulnerable to attack, physical/psychological rejection, etc etc?
"The real game is the game of getting a woman to allow you to hit on her. You can talk and be interesting all day long, but if she won't let you hit on her, you're going NOWHERE."
One thing was unclear to me, can someone help me here: what are good and bad responses after you hitting on her = a statement of intent? my guess is below - please correct / expand:
good reaction: - her being happy for the statement like smiling - her testing you (eg 'do you say this to all girls?'
bad reaction: - trying to brush your statement off ('don't say such silly thing') - her making effort making conversation non-sexual / business-like (?) - mentioning her boyfriend? - ignore? - if she smiles this is not ignore, is it. - her looking uncomfortable - her going away / ending conversation
Jon. Have you thought about you overthinking shit? I mean this is plan old escalation?
ReplyDeleteawesome post, you articulate pretty well the distinction between the two, can't wait for more!
ReplyDeletek.c.
I'm getting confused. How does this relate to Qualification?
ReplyDeleteI thought even in MM I'm intended to HIT on her after she qualified/complied...
This is great stuff, especially the part about her challenging you and wanting to show her who is boss! Great insight man, you are the king of content today! Anyways, looking forward to reading the rest of your thoughts on this subject. Also, 3 Same Day Lays in the past few weeks, nice, I wanna start doing day game! Malls sound cool.
ReplyDeleteI really like this post!
ReplyDeleteonce I opened with a direct opener and then later used a statement of intent. later on the date the girl told me that she could not remember my direct opener but she remembers my statement of intent.
Best article for a long time!
ReplyDeleteI would like to hear more of your thougts on this particular subject...
P.S.: I know you're probably not too keen on writing LR's anymore, but if they had valuable lessons like this I think a lot of people would really benefit from that as well. Just give it a thougt...
John said: "..verbal foreplay. When a woman verbally spars with you she's testing to see if you can handle her. The implications being if you can handle her in conversation you can handle her in the bedroom."
ReplyDeleteThis is the key to the castle. I had a nice little lightbulb moment reading this portion. Living in a civilized modern societies, our brains have had to find modern ways to express their more raw, primitive instincts. So at work, for example, when your Boss is pissed off at you, instead ov tackling you to the ground, mounting your back, and choking you the fuck out, he calls you into his office and subtly, or not-so-subtly proceeds to rip you a new asshole VERBALLY. This is the identical process taking place with verbal foreplay. When we encounter women we want to fuck, convenient as it may be, it's poor form to also tackle and mount. Therefore, we verbally dominate her with sexual overtone to demonstrate what we are capable ov and willing to do. If you can't lead and dominate a woman conversationally in a safe, playful manner, why in the fuck would you ever be able to do so in her bedroom, naked and vulnerable to attack, physical/psychological rejection, etc etc?
On point John.
zer0/po.nt
Awesome post man. Best part...
ReplyDelete"The real game is the game of getting a woman to allow you to hit on her. You can talk and be interesting all day long, but if she won't let you hit on her, you're going NOWHERE."
Thanks for the post!
ReplyDeleteOne thing was unclear to me, can someone help me here: what are good and bad responses after you hitting on her = a statement of intent?
my guess is below - please correct / expand:
good reaction:
- her being happy for the statement like smiling
- her testing you (eg 'do you say this to all girls?'
bad reaction:
- trying to brush your statement off ('don't say such silly thing')
- her making effort making conversation non-sexual / business-like (?)
- mentioning her boyfriend?
- ignore? - if she smiles this is not ignore, is it.
- her looking uncomfortable
- her going away / ending conversation